Quinoa vs Triticale: Which Is Better?

Quinoa and triticale belong to the grains food group, one of the staple food groups for people on a plant-based diet.

Grains and grain products are an affordable source of carbohydrates, as well as essential vitamins and minerals, including B vitamins (such as thiamin, riboflavin, and niacin), iron, and zinc, minerals that are usually harder to get on a plant-based diet.

They also provide a small amount of protein and healthy fats.

However, it is important to note that whole grains are generally a better source of these nutrients than refined grains.

This article will thoroughly compare quinoa and triticale and help you learn more about their similarities and differences.

Quinoa

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) is a grain-like crop grown for its edible seeds.

It is a good source of complete protein, providing all essential amino acids, and also rich in dietary fibers, vitamins, and minerals like magnesium, phosphorus, manganese, and zinc.

Quinoa also contains antioxidants, flavonoids, and anti-inflammatory compounds, which have been linked to various health benefits, including improved blood sugar control, cardiovascular health, and weight management.

It is a versatile ingredient that can be cooked and eaten as a side dish, added to soups and stews, or ground into flour to make breads, pancakes, and other baked goods.

Quinoa is an excellent source of Vitamin B1 (Thiamine), Vitamin B6 (Pyroxidine), and Vitamin B9 (Folate).

It also contains a good amount of Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin), Vitamin B3 (Niacin), Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic acid), and Vitamin E.

Triticale

Triticale (× Triticosecale) is a hybrid cereal grain that is a cross between wheat (Triticum) and rye (Secale).

It is a good source of carbohydrates, dietary fibers, and small amounts of vitamins and minerals like zinc, iron, and B-vitamins. It is also rich in antioxidants and protein, making it a valuable food for vegetarians and vegans.

Triticale is often used in baking and traditional dishes such as porridge and crisp bread. Its unique nutritional profile, which combines the best features of wheat and rye, makes it a good option for people looking for a healthier alternative to wheat or rye.

Triticale is gluten-rich. Thus it is not suitable for people with gluten sensitivities or celiac disease. It can be enjoyed as part of a balanced diet, combined with vegetables, lean protein sources, and healthy fats.

Triticale is an excellent source of Vitamin B1 (Thiamine), and Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic acid).

It also contains a good amount of Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin), and Vitamin B9 (Folate) and some Vitamin B3 (Niacin), Vitamin B6 (Pyroxidine), and Vitamin E.

Quinoa vs Triticale Nutrition

Now that we’ve described the origin, taste, and usage of these foods, we can move to the most interesting part – comparing quinoa vs triticale.

This comparison will start by comparing the caloric value of quinoa and triticale and their macronutrients and then go more in-depth by analyzing their vitamin and mineral content.

Quinoa vs Triticale Calories

Most calories in grains come from carbs.

Comparing triticale vs quinoa for weight loss, triticale is slightly lower in calories, with 336 calories per 100 grams, compared to 368 calories per 100 grams of quinoa.

However, both quinoa and triticale can and should be a part of a healthy diet, and neither one shouldn’t be avoided if you’re looking to lose weight.

Quinoa vs Triticale Protein

Grains and most grain products, including quinoa and triticale, are important sources of plant-based protein.

However, it should be noted that most grains, with the exception of quinoa and buckwheat, for example, are low in lysine and methionine.

That said, you can combine grains with legumes to get a complete protein.

Quinoa offers around 8% more protein than triticale.

Quinoa has 14.1 grams of protein per 100 grams, while triticale has 13 grams of protein per 100 grams.

Quinoa vs Triticale Carbs

Counting carbs can be important for some people for different reasons, including blood sugar control, weight management, or athletic performance.

It’s also important for people on a keto diet, so let’s compare the carbs content in quinoa and triticale.

The total amount of carbohydrates is around 11% higher in triticale than in quinoa. It has 72.1 grams per 100 grams, compared to 64.2 grams in quinoa.

There’s less sugar in triticale than in quinoa, 100% precisely.

That said, 100 grams of triticale contains 0 grams of sugar, while the same amount of quinoa contains 1.5 grams.

Lastly, let’s take a look at the dietary fiber in quinoa and triticale.

Dietary fiber keeps the digestive system healthy and helps with weight management by promoting a sense of fullness.

With 7 grams of fiber per 100 grams, quinoa is a better source of fiber than triticale which quinoa offers 3.4 grams per 100 gram portion.

Quinoa vs Triticale Fats

Like most other grains, quinoa and triticale are low in fat.

Fats in quinoa and triticale are mostly healthy unsaturated fats. They are naturally cholesterol-free and trans-fat-free.

Total fat in quinoa and triticale:

• Quinoa: 6.1 grams per 100 grams
• Triticale: 2.1 per 100 grams

Speaking of saturated fats, triticale is 43% lower in saturated fats.

Triticale and quinoa contain 0.4 grams and 0.7 grams of saturated fat per 100 grams, respectively.

Quinoa vs Triticale Vitamins Content

This section will discuss the vitamin content of quinoa and triticale.

Vitamins are micronutrients, meaning we need only a small amount. However, they are very important for many processes in our bodies.

Quinoa has a higher amount of vitamin B1 (Thiamine), vitamin B5 (Pantothenic acid), and vitamin K.

However, triticale has a higher amount of vitamin A, vitamin B2 (Riboflavin), vitamin B3 (Niacin), vitamin B6 (Pyroxidine), vitamin B9 (Folate), and vitamin E.

Quinoa and triticale contain the same amount of vitamin C, vitamin D, and vitamin B12 (Cobalamin).

The following table shows the exact amount of vitamins quinoa and triticale contain side by side, so you can easily compare them.

Quinoa vs Triticale Minerals Content

Minerals are important for our body to function properly. We need only a small amount of minerals, so they are called micronutrients.

Some minerals, like iron, calcium, zinc, or iodine, are relatively hard to get on a plant-based diet, so it’s important to choose your foods thoughtfully. This part of the quinoa and triticale comparison focuses on their mineral content.

Quinoa is a better source of manganese, and zinc than triticale.

On the other hand, triticale is a higher amount of calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, and selenium.

Quinoa and triticale contain the same amount of fluoride, and sodium.

Check out the table below to learn how quinoa and triticale compare when it comes to mineral content.

The Final Word

This article highlighted the similarities and differences between quinoa and triticale.

Grains, also known as cereal grains, are an important source of nutrition for many people around the world. They are a rich source of carbohydrates, which provide energy for the body.

Whole grains contain important vitamins and minerals, such as B vitamins and iron. Whole grains, in particular, are high in dietary fiber and can help with digestion and weight management.

They may also have other health benefits, such as reducing the risk of heart disease, diabetes, and certain types of cancer.

Grains are also a staple food and an important source of food security in many parts of the world.